Difference between revisions of "Talk:Windows 9x Builds"

From Vogons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "Running Windows 95 is not just "theoretically" on a 386 since I have such a system running. e.g. Windows 98 requires a 486 (DX66 recommended). ~~~~")
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Running Windows 95 is not just "theoretically" on a 386 since I have such a system running.  
 
Running Windows 95 is not just "theoretically" on a 386 since I have such a system running.  
 
e.g. Windows 98 requires a 486 (DX66 recommended). [[User:Enigma|Enigma]] ([[User talk:Enigma|talk]]) 13:08, 21 February 2013 (EST)
 
e.g. Windows 98 requires a 486 (DX66 recommended). [[User:Enigma|Enigma]] ([[User talk:Enigma|talk]]) 13:08, 21 February 2013 (EST)
 +
 +
:theoretically in terms of about any Win95 game other than Minesweeper though ;) but ok not the best wording [[User:D1stortion|D1stortion]] ([[User talk:D1stortion|talk]]) 13:12, 21 February 2013 (EST)
 +
 +
 +
== ATI ==
 +
Can the Rage 128 be an exception to the "No ATI" rule? It has a Paletted textures option available in the drivers' control panel but warns not to always have this on, and only use it when necessary. -[[User:Leilei|Leilei]] ([[User talk:Leilei|talk]]) 10:55, 4 March 2013 (EST)

Latest revision as of 09:55, 4 March 2013

Running Windows 95 is not just "theoretically" on a 386 since I have such a system running. e.g. Windows 98 requires a 486 (DX66 recommended). Enigma (talk) 13:08, 21 February 2013 (EST)

theoretically in terms of about any Win95 game other than Minesweeper though ;) but ok not the best wording D1stortion (talk) 13:12, 21 February 2013 (EST)


ATI

Can the Rage 128 be an exception to the "No ATI" rule? It has a Paletted textures option available in the drivers' control panel but warns not to always have this on, and only use it when necessary. -Leilei (talk) 10:55, 4 March 2013 (EST)