Difference between revisions of "Storage"

From Vogons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Modern Storage for Retro Computers)
(Modern Storage for Retro Computers)
Line 38: Line 38:
 
===Modern Storage for Retro Computers===
 
===Modern Storage for Retro Computers===
 
'''CF (Compact Flash)'''
 
'''CF (Compact Flash)'''
 +
 
A popular portable storage format developed in 1994 that is compatible with IDE.  Standard has changed little since 2010 and and is declining in popularity because it is too large for phones.
 
A popular portable storage format developed in 1994 that is compatible with IDE.  Standard has changed little since 2010 and and is declining in popularity because it is too large for phones.
 
* CompactFlash 1.0 (1995) supported PIO2 with capacity up to 128 GB.
 
* CompactFlash 1.0 (1995) supported PIO2 with capacity up to 128 GB.
Line 53: Line 54:
  
 
'''SD to IDE'''
 
'''SD to IDE'''
A popular portable storage format developed in 1999.  Standard has not changed much in the past 12 years.
+
 
 +
A popular portable storage format developed in 1999.
  
 
Pros
 
Pros
Line 64: Line 66:
  
 
'''Pata DOM (Disk on Module)'''
 
'''Pata DOM (Disk on Module)'''
 +
 
Pros
 
Pros
 
*
 
*

Revision as of 23:12, 23 March 2021

What controller will you use?

Early IDE (IDE, ATA-1)

  • IDE for 16bit ISA controllers, connects IDE storage devices directly to the ISA bus
  • Few storage devices from this period supported the DMA modes.
  • Processors <= 386 are frequently CPU bound when doing PIO
  • Modern storage devices seem to reliably fall back to ATA-1

Early EIDE (Ultra ATA, UDMA/33 )

  • Common between 1993-1998
  • Mid to Late 486, Early Pentiums
  • 80 connector IDE cables recommended but not required
  • Noticeable performance improvements when using multiword IO & DMA modes.
  • Controllers from this period sometimes have trouble negotiating with SD-IDE adapters and DOMs
  • Storage devices from this period sometimes have trouble working in LBA mode with newer controllers
  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCI_IDE_ISA_Xcelerator

Mature ATA (ATA-66, ATA-100 & ATA-133)

  • Common between 1999-2010
  • 80 connector IDE cables required to negotiate speeds faster than ATA/33. If using a DOM or CF adapter with a female connector and no cable, Pin #34 needs to be grounded
  • Not a large performance difference between ATA-66 & ATA-133 for most storage devices
  • Controllers connected via PCI bus see a small performance drop compared to a IHA or Vlink attached controllers
  • UDMA modes are necessary to achieve peak speeds in most cases
  • Most motherboards BIOS I/O routines are not able to take advantage of DMA
  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I/O_Controller_Hub

IDE and BIOS Limits & Incompatibilities

  • 528 MB limit - BIOS before July 1994 rarely support drives over 528MB. They were limited to Cylinders <= 1024, Heads <= 16, Sectors/Track <= 63
  • 2015 MB limit - BIOS before May 1996 rarely support drives larger than 2015 MB. They were limited to Cylinders <= 4095, Heads <= 16, Sectors/Track <= 63
  • 3277 MB limit - Phoenix BIOS 4.03 and 4.04 config screens lock when a drive is configured with a capacity over 3277 MB.
  • 4.2 GB limit - Some BIOS before February 1997 have the first ECHS (Extended CHS) limit. DOS and Windows 95/98 cannot handle 256 heads. 'Large' mode in the BIOS produces an alternate geometry by doubling the number of heads and halving the number of cylinders shown to DOS until cylinders <= 1024. The limit for this method is 4032 MB (C=1024, H = 128, S = 63) for drives that report 16 heads.
  • 7.9 GB limit - Other BIOS from this period had a Revised ECHS limit. 'Large' mode in the BIOS by presenting an alternate geometry using multiples of 15 heads so that 240 heads can be presented as the max alternate geometry. This method stops working at 7560 MB (C=1024, H=240, S=63)
  • 8.4 GB limit - Final ECHS limit - Bios geometry selects head head value from the sequence 16, 32, 64, 128, 255 to present an alternate geometry up to (C=1024, H=255, S=63). Hard drives larger than 8.4GB report a geometry of C=16383,H=16,S=63 to indicate that they are larger than can be described using ECHS geometry translation)
  • 33.8 GB limit - BIOS before August 1999 often stored the cylinders as a 16 bit value, so they could not process cylinders > 65535.
  • 137.4 GB limit - BIOS before September 2001 only used ATA-5, which used 28 bits to identify each LBA sector, limiting drive capacity to 137GB. ATA-6 extended this to 48 bits. Hard drives over 137.4 GB should report an LBA capacity of 0xfffffff sectors and report the actual value in the 48-bit field.
  • Early LBA drives do not always work correctly with mature LBA controllers and must be manually set to 'CHS' mode in order to operate correctly.

Modern Storage for Retro Computers

CF (Compact Flash)

A popular portable storage format developed in 1994 that is compatible with IDE. Standard has changed little since 2010 and and is declining in popularity because it is too large for phones.

  • CompactFlash 1.0 (1995) supported PIO2 with capacity up to 128 GB.
  • CompactFlash 2.0 (2003) added PIO4 followed by DMA 33 in mid-2004.
  • CompactFlash 3.0 (2004) added UDMA 66 (UDMA3)
  • CompactFlash 4.0 (2006) added IDE Ultra DMA Mode 6 and UDMA 133
  • CompactFlash 5.0 (2010) added LBA 48 for drivers larger than 132GB
  • CompactFlash 6.0 (November 2010) added UltraDMA Mode 7 (167 MByte/s), ATA-8/ACS-2 sanitize command, and TRIM support

Pros

  • Natively compatible with 5V ATA, which makes 40 and 44 pin IDE adapters very simple.
  • Fewer reports of compatibility issues with EIDE adapters

Cons

  • Some devices require 3.3V instead of 5V
  • Performance is slower on small files compared to some other storage devices

SD to IDE

A popular portable storage format developed in 1999.

Pros

  • Very common storage media
  • Quick response on small reads and writes

Cons

  • Can be sensitive to ESD ( electro static discharge)
  • Popular brands are commonly counterfeited
  • Popular IDE adapter is limited to 25MB/s speeds when talking to SD devices

Pata DOM (Disk on Module)

Pros

Cons

Sata Drive

Pros

Cons

mSata

Pros

Cons

M2 Sata

Pros

Cons

USB to IDE

Pros

Cons

Sata SSD Pros

Cons

Sata DOM Pros

Cons

Common Legacy Storage

Sata DOM

Rare Legacy Storage