Difference between revisions of "3.5 inch floppy disk"

From Vogons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "This format was designed to be smaller then the 5.25in floppydrive and it's media and fixed some of the 5.25in floppies design problems. The disks are housed in a stiff housin...")
 
(Category, copyediting)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This format was designed to be smaller then the 5.25in floppydrive and it's media and fixed some of the 5.25in floppies design problems.
+
This format was designed to be smaller than the [[5.25 inch floppy|5.25" floppy drive and its media]] and fixed some of the 5.25" design problems. The disks are housed in a stiff casing, opposed to the "floppy" plastic the 5.25" disk was housed in. Despite the more rugged design, 3.5 inch floppy drives tend to to be less reliable due to their compact nature.
The disks are housed in a stiff housing, opposed to the "floppy" housing the 5.25in floppy was made in.
+
 
 +
3.5" floppies came in three different densities (easily distinguished by a second hole on the side) and while only the earliest disks were single sided, almost all 3.5" floppies can be written to on both sides.
  
3.5in floppies came in 3 different densities (easily distinguished by a second hole on the side) and while only the earliest 3.5in disks were single sided, almost all 3.5in floppies can be written to on both sides.
 
 
The 3 densities are:
 
The 3 densities are:
*Double density (a.k.a. DD)
 
*High density (a.k.a. HD)
 
*Extra high density (a.k.a. ED)
 
  
Like earlier floppies, there were many different ways to format a disk, often depending on what type of computer the disk was formatted with.
+
* Double density (DD, 720 kB)
On PC's, DD disks were usually (DOS-)formatted to 720KB (though in practice it had about 714KB of usable space), HD disks formatted to 1.44MB (in practice it was around 1.38MB) and the uncommon 2.88MB disks formatted to around 2.76MB. On older Macs the DD disks formatted to around 820KB.
+
* High density (HD, 1.44 MB)
 +
* Extended density (ED, 2.88 MB)
 +
 
 +
Like earlier floppies, there were many different ways to format a disk, often depending on what type of computer the disk was formatted with. On PC's, DD disks were usually (DOS-)formatted to 720 KB (though in practice it had about 714 KB of usable space), HD disks formatted to 1.44 MB (in practice it was around 1.38 MB) and the uncommon 2.88 MB disks (primarily used in IBM PS/2s) formatted to around 2.76MB. On older Macs the DD disks formatted to around 820 KB, and on Amiga 880 KB.
 +
 
 +
In the 1990s the demand for higher capacities increased. Software utilities appeared that could format disks to higher capacities like 1.72 MB. By loading a small TSR-driver such formatted disks could be used like the normal 1.44 MB formatted disks in DOS. Well known tools are fdformat (fdread), vgacopy (vgaread). Even Microsoft made use of this by introducing the DMF format (1.68 MB) for distributing software on disks. Current archiving tools like Winimage also support disks with increased capacity.
 +
 
 +
Most over-formatting utilities don't handle ED disks, as the format never gained much popularity.
 +
[[File:DD HD ED.JPG|200px|thumb||Unformatted capacity of DD, HD and ED disks]]
 +
 
 +
The overall transfer speed when reading from a 1.44 MB disk is about 30 kB/s. This could be tuned by formatting disks with an optimal track interleave that reduces access times after a track change on sequential reads significantly. Tools like vgacopy offered this feature.
  
In addition to the standard DOS formatting utility, there are several other 3rd party formatting utilities around (Winimage is one of them) which can overformat disks to hold more space (even Microsoft used it's DMF format to distribute media, which could hold upto around 1.68MB instead of the usual 1.38MB).
+
[[Category:Removable media]]
Most overformatting utilities won't overformat ED disks though but as these disks and it's drives are very hard to come by, this is hardly significant.
+

Latest revision as of 16:33, 17 April 2016

This format was designed to be smaller than the 5.25" floppy drive and its media and fixed some of the 5.25" design problems. The disks are housed in a stiff casing, opposed to the "floppy" plastic the 5.25" disk was housed in. Despite the more rugged design, 3.5 inch floppy drives tend to to be less reliable due to their compact nature.

3.5" floppies came in three different densities (easily distinguished by a second hole on the side) and while only the earliest disks were single sided, almost all 3.5" floppies can be written to on both sides.

The 3 densities are:

  • Double density (DD, 720 kB)
  • High density (HD, 1.44 MB)
  • Extended density (ED, 2.88 MB)

Like earlier floppies, there were many different ways to format a disk, often depending on what type of computer the disk was formatted with. On PC's, DD disks were usually (DOS-)formatted to 720 KB (though in practice it had about 714 KB of usable space), HD disks formatted to 1.44 MB (in practice it was around 1.38 MB) and the uncommon 2.88 MB disks (primarily used in IBM PS/2s) formatted to around 2.76MB. On older Macs the DD disks formatted to around 820 KB, and on Amiga 880 KB.

In the 1990s the demand for higher capacities increased. Software utilities appeared that could format disks to higher capacities like 1.72 MB. By loading a small TSR-driver such formatted disks could be used like the normal 1.44 MB formatted disks in DOS. Well known tools are fdformat (fdread), vgacopy (vgaread). Even Microsoft made use of this by introducing the DMF format (1.68 MB) for distributing software on disks. Current archiving tools like Winimage also support disks with increased capacity.

Most over-formatting utilities don't handle ED disks, as the format never gained much popularity.

Unformatted capacity of DD, HD and ED disks

The overall transfer speed when reading from a 1.44 MB disk is about 30 kB/s. This could be tuned by formatting disks with an optimal track interleave that reduces access times after a track change on sequential reads significantly. Tools like vgacopy offered this feature.