Talk:Socket 7 benchmark results - Revision history

RacoonRider at 16:53, 24 February 2013

2013-02-24T16:53:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:53, 24 February 2013
Line 18:		Line 18:
	Could you please check the Pentium table for the Pentium 150 MHz. Shouldn't it be that the FSB states 50 MHz and multiplier 3x ?		Could you please check the Pentium table for the Pentium 150 MHz. Shouldn't it be that the FSB states 50 MHz and multiplier 3x ?
	[[User:Enigma\|Enigma]] ([[User talk:Enigma\|talk]]) 01:26, 25 February 2013 (EST)		[[User:Enigma\|Enigma]] ([[User talk:Enigma\|talk]]) 01:26, 25 February 2013 (EST)

			I used ASUS P55T2P4 User's manual, it's the only config suggested for 150MHz Pentium CPU there. It's right here on page 10 (16 if you count contents section). http://dlcdnet.asus.com/pub/ASUS/mb/sock7/430hx/p55t2p4/p55t2p4-311.pdf
			[[User:RacoonRider\|RacoonRider]] ([[User talk:RacoonRider\|talk]]) 03:53, 25 February 2013 (EST)

Enigma at 14:26, 24 February 2013

2013-02-24T14:26:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:26, 24 February 2013
Line 15:		Line 15:
	Speedsys 4.75 and 4.78 results are confirmed to match. Memory bandwith is confirmed to be a function of FSB, not CPU speed. Bandwith was tested with the same CPU on different FSB speeds (50MHz, 60MHz, 66MHz, 75MHz). Results are in the table.		Speedsys 4.75 and 4.78 results are confirmed to match. Memory bandwith is confirmed to be a function of FSB, not CPU speed. Bandwith was tested with the same CPU on different FSB speeds (50MHz, 60MHz, 66MHz, 75MHz). Results are in the table.
	[[User:RacoonRider\|RacoonRider]] ([[User talk:RacoonRider\|talk]]) 22:00, 24 February 2013 (EST)		[[User:RacoonRider\|RacoonRider]] ([[User talk:RacoonRider\|talk]]) 22:00, 24 February 2013 (EST)

			Could you please check the Pentium table for the Pentium 150 MHz. Shouldn't it be that the FSB states 50 MHz and multiplier 3x ?
			[[User:Enigma\|Enigma]] ([[User talk:Enigma\|talk]]) 01:26, 25 February 2013 (EST)

RacoonRider at 11:00, 24 February 2013

2013-02-24T11:00:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:00, 24 February 2013
Line 12:		Line 12:
	I'll find 4.78 and rerun the test.		I'll find 4.78 and rerun the test.
	[[User:RacoonRider\|RacoonRider]] ([[User talk:RacoonRider\|talk]]) 20:54, 24 February 2013 (EST)		[[User:RacoonRider\|RacoonRider]] ([[User talk:RacoonRider\|talk]]) 20:54, 24 February 2013 (EST)

			Speedsys 4.75 and 4.78 results are confirmed to match. Memory bandwith is confirmed to be a function of FSB, not CPU speed. Bandwith was tested with the same CPU on different FSB speeds (50MHz, 60MHz, 66MHz, 75MHz). Results are in the table.
			[[User:RacoonRider\|RacoonRider]] ([[User talk:RacoonRider\|talk]]) 22:00, 24 February 2013 (EST)

RacoonRider at 09:54, 24 February 2013

2013-02-24T09:54:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:54, 24 February 2013
Line 8:		Line 8:
	The same performance behavior is also shown by Mad Lunatics score for the 430FX with P200.		The same performance behavior is also shown by Mad Lunatics score for the 430FX with P200.
	[[User:Enigma\|Enigma]] ([[User talk:Enigma\|talk]]) 02:17, 24 February 2013 (EST)		[[User:Enigma\|Enigma]] ([[User talk:Enigma\|talk]]) 02:17, 24 February 2013 (EST)

			I guess, that's because SpeedSys 4.75 uses abstract "memory score", not actual bandwith. If you look at memory speed curves, they're practically identical.
			I'll find 4.78 and rerun the test.
			[[User:RacoonRider\|RacoonRider]] ([[User talk:RacoonRider\|talk]]) 20:54, 24 February 2013 (EST)

Enigma at 15:19, 23 February 2013

2013-02-23T15:19:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:19, 23 February 2013
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Could you please check the config of your benchmark machine once more? It is a bit odd that I get 223 MB/s mem speed whereas you get 157 MB/s on a very similar machine (this is 42% higher!).		Could you please check the config of your benchmark machine once more? It is a bit odd that I get 223 MB/s mem speed whereas you get 157 MB/s on a very similar machine (this is 42% higher!).
	At least is represents the few percent different towards SDRAM usage quite well. [[User:Enigma\|Enigma]] ([[User talk:Enigma\|talk]]) 02:17, 24 February 2013 (EST)		At least it represents the few percent different towards SDRAM usage quite well.
			The same performance behavior is also shown by Mad Lunatics score for the 430FX with P200.
			[[User:Enigma\|Enigma]] ([[User talk:Enigma\|talk]]) 02:17, 24 February 2013 (EST)

Enigma at 15:17, 23 February 2013

2013-02-23T15:17:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:17, 23 February 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:

	Thanks, I'll take that into account :) [[User:RacoonRider\|RacoonRider]] ([[User talk:RacoonRider\|talk]]) 20:22, 21 February 2013 (EST)		Thanks, I'll take that into account :) [[User:RacoonRider\|RacoonRider]] ([[User talk:RacoonRider\|talk]]) 20:22, 21 February 2013 (EST)

			Could you please check the config of your benchmark machine once more? It is a bit odd that I get 223 MB/s mem speed whereas you get 157 MB/s on a very similar machine (this is 42% higher!).
			At least is represents the few percent different towards SDRAM usage quite well. [[User:Enigma\|Enigma]] ([[User talk:Enigma\|talk]]) 02:17, 24 February 2013 (EST)

RacoonRider at 09:23, 21 February 2013

2013-02-21T09:23:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:23, 21 February 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	RacoonRider, I noticed that some of your articles are nowhere linked on the main page or even other articles. If no one can find your articles, they won't be of much use to anyone. Just saying :) [[User:D1stortion\|D1stortion]] ([[User talk:D1stortion\|talk]]) 19:52, 21 February 2013 (EST)		RacoonRider, I noticed that some of your articles are nowhere linked on the main page or even other articles. If no one can find your articles, they won't be of much use to anyone. Just saying :) [[User:D1stortion\|D1stortion]] ([[User talk:D1stortion\|talk]]) 19:52, 21 February 2013 (EST)


	Thanks, I'll take that into account :) [[User:RacoonRider\|RacoonRider]] ([[User talk:RacoonRider\|talk]]) 20:22, 21 February 2013 (EST)		Thanks, I'll take that into account :) [[User:RacoonRider\|RacoonRider]] ([[User talk:RacoonRider\|talk]]) 20:22, 21 February 2013 (EST)

RacoonRider at 09:22, 21 February 2013

2013-02-21T09:22:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:22, 21 February 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	RacoonRider, I noticed that some of your articles are nowhere linked on the main page or even other articles. If no one can find your articles, they won't be of much use to anyone. Just saying :) [[User:D1stortion\|D1stortion]] ([[User talk:D1stortion\|talk]]) 19:52, 21 February 2013 (EST)		RacoonRider, I noticed that some of your articles are nowhere linked on the main page or even other articles. If no one can find your articles, they won't be of much use to anyone. Just saying :) [[User:D1stortion\|D1stortion]] ([[User talk:D1stortion\|talk]]) 19:52, 21 February 2013 (EST)
			Thanks, I'll take that into account :) [[User:RacoonRider\|RacoonRider]] ([[User talk:RacoonRider\|talk]]) 20:22, 21 February 2013 (EST)

D1stortion: Created page with "RacoonRider, I noticed that some of your articles are nowhere linked on the main page or even other articles. If no one can find your articles, they won't be of much use to an..."

2013-02-21T08:52:30Z

Created page with "RacoonRider, I noticed that some of your articles are nowhere linked on the main page or even other articles. If no one can find your articles, they won't be of much use to an..."

New page

RacoonRider, I noticed that some of your articles are nowhere linked on the main page or even other articles. If no one can find your articles, they won't be of much use to anyone. Just saying :) [[User:D1stortion|D1stortion]] ([[User talk:D1stortion|talk]]) 19:52, 21 February 2013 (EST)